Nike shoes delivery case

In August last year, the nephew of Changzhou countryside who has passed the North. To reward him, I purposely buy a pair of Nike Shoes, passing near the Express entrusted to him to post. But two days later, the nephew of the calls, saying that he has received is no longer a pair of broken shoes broke the old ... ...

There such a thing? I am wondering and decided to find a courier company to have a say.

Claimed to be a responsible person I am Mr. Wang received his explanation is given: to me the other day to fill one of the people express their units although the previous staff, but has already left. At that time, he came to people, and the salesman that he is looking for a work out, he made the decision himself, take the. Therefore, the fault in the express delivery company failure, the client does not ask what they delivered to him, should also bear some responsibility. As for how to resolve, Mr. Wang proposed me to buy a pair of Nike Shoes, half of them bear the cost, while also granting relief for rush delivery.

I certainly can not agree. Time was delayed to say the least, I would also like to pay once again, this is the reason why not. See I do not open one's mouth, Mr. Wang said: "or, you fill find that you express to claim a single person?" I'm more a fire, and he is definitely a rogue it! Made a very angry about the table (table a piece of shattered glass), called Road: I would like to do the procedures, and to express a single card, why should I go to that person? I also threatened them that I am in the Public Security Bureau, the Trade and Industry Bureau has an acquaintance, if not give me a satisfactory answer, and tomorrow you'll see the color ... ... Even so, the other is not willing to. Unfortunately, I had no choice but to call consumer protection to the District Committee for help.

In a moment, Consumer Protection Committee to the people, and listening to both statements, immediately position: customer knowledge, companies have a responsibility! The reason is simple: customers are directed at companies and how to know which were true of the sub? Furthermore, not eligible to apply for a business, how can the issuance of delivery orders, which indicate a clear loophole in corporate governance?

Mr. Wang did not say, and finally had no choice but to "concessions" and promised full compensation for my Nike Shoes. And I will have to be to pay for that piece of plate glass.